Yup, things are heating up.
There were some comments posted under the article.
Here's some remarks that I found interesting.
"Physics predicted it over 100 years ago, the temperature record confirmed it 30 years ago, and now direct satellite measurements of heat trapped, ice melt, CO2 emissions and other parameters put it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
So the only possible path for a denier is to produce a conspiracy theory that says tens of thousands of climate scientists are rorting us... and the dozen or so beholding to the oil industry are the only ones telling the truth.
This is why entering 'the climate debate' is entering the world of the loony, but it must be done."
One of the things that I find curious is, many people on both sides of this issue have taken their position because they follow a group of their peers, not because they've investigated and weighed the facts.
Yet, when they turn out to be right, they'll pat themselves on the back for being so smart.
That's like taking credit for calling a flip of a coin.
There are people that think they're handicapping when they choose a horse because they like its name.
People be weird critters.
Posted 2360 day(s) ago